El tratado Ars rhetorica y el comentario al Timeo de Casio Longino. Testimonios de La Recepción de Platón en La Antigüedad Tardía

n 19 (January, 2017) • Archai: As Origens do Pensamento Ocidental

Autor: Liliana Carolina Sánchez Castro

Abstract:

he Ars Rhetorica of Cassius Longinus is not a work that has enjoyed particular popularity in studies of ancient rhetoric or on the philosophical activity in Late Antiquity. This is due, in part, to the shadow casted over this work by the anonymous treatise On Sublimity which was attributed to Cassius Longinus for a long time; in part, to the fact that this treatise and the rest of Cassius Longinus’ work is preserved in fragments; in part, because his most famous disciple, Porphyry, left his tutelage to follow the teachings of the most reputed Plotinus, who considered Cassius Longinus a philologist, but not a philosopher. Regardless of the reasons that contributed to eclipse the work of Cassius Longinus, namely, the unphilosophical spirit Plotinus saw in him or the poor quality of the sources we have for his study; the work of this author carries valuable information for the reconstruction of intellectual activity of the time.

My aim is to examine one of the cases where Cassius Longinus can be an exceptional witness of the scholarly and philosophical activity which constitutes the Platonic tradition in Late Antiquity. At the end of the Ars Rhetorica’s chapter devoted to utterance (???? ??????) Cassius Longinus exposes his theory of rhetoric period. The fragments of the commentary that Cassius Longinus made on Plato’s Timaeus preserved in the commentary of Proclus sheds light on how Cassius Longinus received Plato's dialogue and applied his exegetical work from a stylistic point of view (in accordance with his work in rhetoric), but also from a philological one. I want to explore, to the extent that the fragmentary material allows me, the link between logic and aesthetics emphasized in the Ars Rhetorica in the light of Cassius Longinus’ own exegetical work on Plato. Thus, it may be possible to reconcile the philological and philosophical work of our author while shedding light on one of the chapters of the Platonic tradition in Late Antiquity.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14195/1984-249X_19_7

Texto Completo: http://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/5767/5221

Palavras-Chave: Ars Rhetorica,Cassius Longinus,Late Antiquity

Archai: As Origens do Pensamento Ocidental

Archai: Journal on the origins of Ancient Thought is published three times a year by Archai UNESCO Chair (University of Brasilia, Brazil).

It is published in Brazil (University of Brasília/Annablume) and in Portugal (Coimbra University Press, IUC), both printed and electronic free online access.

All manuscripts will undergo blind-review by peers.

Archai Journal is committed to a speedy and author-friendly review process; Authors can expect to receive notification the editorial decision within four months.

It is indexed by Web of Science - ESCI (Emerging Sources Citation Index), SciELO, European Reference Index for the Humanities and Social Sciences (ERIH Plus), L’Année Philologique, Philosopher‘s Index, DOAJ, Phil Brasil, Latindex, Cengage Learning, Google Schoolar, BASE, Diadorim, PKP Index and Portal de Periódicos da CAPES. It has Impact Factor 5.171 in the Scientific Journal Impact Factor and it got the second best grade (A2) of its field (Philosophy) in the latest Qualis CAPES evaluation.