To be (something) or not to be: Existence and predication in Aristotle’s logic and metaphysics

Vol 11, No 1 (2010) • Filosofia Unisinos - Unisinos Journal of Philosophy

Autor: Miguel Candel Sanmartín

Resumo:

This paper offers a new interpretation of Aristotle’s logical system that allows us to break away from a presumably inescapable dilemma inherent to any attempt of justification from a strictly formal standpoint; namely, either the system stands apart from any standard system of mathematical logic — propositional logic, class theory, quantification theory, etc. — or it is lacking in consistency. While some other attempts have been made that seem to avoid this dilemma, they have always resulted in an intolerably strong restriction of the Semantics underpinning the Aristotelian system. These are, therefore, unsatisfactory solutions that undermine some of the key principles of Aristotelian metaphysics. One by-product of the solution presented here is a reappraisal of some elements in Aristotle’s theory of Being that breaks down several contemporary misconceptions on the subject.

ISSN: ISSN: 1984-8234

Texto Completo: http://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/filosofia/article/view/4634

Palavras-Chave: logic,Aristotle´s logic,justification, mathem

Filosofia Unisinos - Unisinos Journal of Philosophy


The journal Filosofia Unisinos - Unisinos Journal of Philosophy is published once every four months by Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos.

Articles must be original, unpublished, and not under consideration for publication anywhere else and can be written in Portuguese, English or Spanish

Filosofia Unisinos - Unisinos Journal of Philosophy prints articles, translations and critical book reviews. It also reprints papers that are considered fundamental to the area when authorized written permission is given by the original publisher.