Concepts: neither Representations nor Abilities but Rules
Vol 22, No 2 (2018) • Principia: an international journal of epistemology
Autor: Federico Castellano
Abstract:
Philosophers have always tried to explain what concepts are. Currently, most neo- Fregean philosophers identify concepts with abilities peculiar to cognitive agents. Philosophers who defend a psychological view, in contrast, identify concepts with representations located in the mind. In this paper, I argue that concepts should be understood neither in terms of mental representations nor in terms of abilities. Concepts, I argue, are rules for sorting an inferring. To support this, I follow Ginsborg’s Kantian conception of concepts. Nevertheless, unlike Ginsborg, I provide an explanation of the cognitive relationship between concepts and thinkers that presupposes no linguistic awareness of any normative concept. In doing so, a dispositional approach to the normativity of concepts is proposed.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5007/1808-1711.2018v22n2p277
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2018v22n2p277/pdf
Palavras-Chave: Concepts,Representational Theory of Mind,Conc
Principia: an international journal of epistemology
!["PRINCIPIA]("http://anpof.org/portal/images/portal_periodicos_eletronicos_2017/PRINCIPIA-CABECALHO.jpg")
"Principia: an international journal of epistemology" was founded in 1997 and regularly publishes articles, discussions and review. The journal aims to publish original scholarly work especially in epistemology area , with an emphasis on material of general interest to academic philosophers. Originally published only in print version (ISSN: 1414-4247), in 2005 the journal began to be published also in online version (ISSN: 1808-1711). Since 1999 are published three issues per year: in April, August and December. Qualis CAPES: A2