Revolutions, incommensurability and scientific rationality in Thomas Kuhn’s later writings

Vol 17, No 1 (2013) • Principia: an international journal of epistemology

Autor: Tamires Dal Magro

Abstract:

Kuhn continued producing very high quality philosophy after The structure of scientific revolutions (1962) until his death in 1996. This paper describes the changes his thought underwent regarding three theses: (1) that scientific development is not cumulative, (2) that paradigms are incommensurable, and (3) that the choice of new paradigms in periods of revolution is not based solely on observations and logical reasoning. These three theses were the subject of controversies in the initial reception of Kuhn’s work, motivating strong criticisms of the image of science allegedly defended by author. In response to those criticisms Kuhn emphasized the realistic aspect of his philosophy and reformulated in more linguistic terms theses (1) and (2), but he left unchanged thesis (3). We argue that the changes introduced in (1) and (2) rendered Kuhn’s views more accurate and less comprehensive, and that thesis (3) was remained inadequately developed.

ISSN: 1414-4217

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5007/1808-1711.2013v17n1p183

Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2013v17n1p183/26269

Palavras-Chave: Kuhn,scientific revolutions,incommensurabilit

Principia: an international journal of epistemology

"PRINCIPIA
"Principia: an international journal of epistemology" was founded in 1997 and regularly publishes articles, discussions and review. The journal aims to publish original scholarly work especially in epistemology area , with an emphasis on material of general interest to academic philosophers. Originally published only in print version (ISSN: 1414-4247), in 2005 the journal began to be published also in online version (ISSN: 1808-1711). Since 1999 are published three issues per year: in April, August and December. Qualis CAPES: A2