Autor: LUCAS RIBEIRO VOLLET

Abstract:

This paper is an assessment of the scientific role of the study of semantics to represent the technical types of consensus produced in human practice. We intend to bring up the problem of meaning outside the comfortable sphere of a simple, synchronic and a-historical line between meaning and pseudo-meaning. On the other hand, we question Quine's skepticism about the theoretical usefulness of postulating meanings. We will reverse the point of Quine's skeptical argument by stating that the underdetermination of an intensional theory by behavioral facts - the multiplicity of equally valid analytical hypotheses - favors the conclusion that intensional theories are necessary rather than disposable. We will argue that the theoretical understanding of the intensional hypothesis of use for sentences is an option to give stability to interpretative exchanges and communications. And it is so especially in contexts that favor the multiplicity of hypotheses about meaning (e.g., translation). Finally, we will make an apologetic return to the Fregean concept of Sense, arguing that there is a utility for semantic values even in contexts in which they depend on theoretical or regional contexts to be unlocked as a possible reference coordinate (modal, counterfactual contexts, etc.). We propose that "meaning" should not be understood as a projection of success, canonized as an absolute rational method; but rather as a series of strategies of assertion, which develop circularly in the historical sphere of communication. Our thesis can be situated as an alliance of Dummett’s pragmatic interpretation of the Fregean concept of Sinn.

Texto Completo: http://periodicos.uefs.br/index.php/revistaideacao/article/view/7450

Palavras-Chave: Semantics, Consensus, Meaning, Pragmatism.